Carnap, Logicism, and Ontological Commitment

نویسنده

  • Otávio Bueno
چکیده

In a number of works, Rudolf Carnap provided ingenious and systematic approaches to the understanding of scientific knowledge (see, for instance, Carnap 1928, 1934, 1947, 1950a, b). As is well known, his proposals faced three important changes: (i) the early phenomenalism of the Logische Aufbau der Welt (Carnap 1928) was replaced by the physicalism of Logische Syntax der Sprache (Carnap 1934); (ii) the primarily syntactic account of Logische Syntax was then replaced by the semantic and modal views of Meaning and Necessity (Carnap 1947); and (iii) the deductivism that characterized Carnap’s early work was eventually replaced by the probabilism of Logical Foundations of Probability (Carnap 1950a). These shifts in philosophical perspective occurred against the background of the explicit use of mathematical and logical techniques, and they were articulated to preserve an essentially empiricist attitude towards science. The commitment to empiricism remained unchanged throughout Carnap’s career.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Carnap, Logicism, and Ontological Commitment1

Throughout most of his career, Rudolf Carnap attempted to articulate an empiricist view. Central to this project is the understanding of how empiricism can be made compatible with abstract objects that seem to be invoked in mathematics. In this paper, I discuss and critically evaluate three moves made by Carnap to accommodate mathematical talk within his empiricist program: (i) the “weak logici...

متن کامل

Carnap and the Rational Reconstruction of the Language of Physics

0 Introduction 1 Logicism, Hilbert and the problem of a priori knowledge 2 Special relativity and the fact/convention dichotomy 3 Theoretical and observational sentences 4 Correspondence rules 5 Ramsey and Carnap sentences and the distinction between the factual and the conventional 6 A Quinean problem and its solution 7 Considerations in favor of Carnap’s reconstruction 8 Is a theory its Ramse...

متن کامل

On Quine on Carnap on Ontology

terms, but merely an explanation of my reaction to those objections [to the use of such terms] and of my impression that no sufficiently compelling reasons for them were given. Nevertheless, I thought that these objections deserved to be given careful and serious attention. This I did in my article “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”.39 Notice that Carnap denied that the objections his empiri...

متن کامل

The Incompleteness Theorem, Volume 53, Number 4

414 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 53, NUMBER 4 I n September 1930 in Königsberg, on the third day of a symposium devoted to the foundations of mathematics, the young Kurt Gödel launched his bombshell announcing his incompleteness theorem. At that time, there were three recognized “schools” on the foundations of mathematics: the logicism based on the work of Frege, Russell, and Whitehead that saw ma...

متن کامل

The Modern Epistemic Interpretations of Probability: Logicism and Subjectivism

This chapter will focus on the modern epistemic interpretations of probability, namely logicism and subjectivism. The qualification “modern” is meant to oppose the “classical” interpretation of probability developed by Pierre Simon de Laplace (1749-1827). With respect to Laplace’s definition, modern epistemic interpretations do not retain the strict linkage with the doctrine of determinism. Mor...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016